The French Lieutenants Woman By John Fowles Essays - John Fowles

The French Lieutenant's Woman by John Fowles On page 316 of the novel The French Lieutenant's Woman author John Fowles briefly interrupts the fiction to discuss with the reader his role as a novelist. He has come up with two very different endings to the novel and wishes to share both with his readers. However, he cannot give two storyline endings simultaneously, and if one comes before another, the final chapter will seem more potent than the first. In trying not to side with any particular characters he decides on a coin toss to decide which conclusion to give last. At this point Charles is on a train, and Fowles considers leaving him there to allow the reader the opportunity devise their own conclusion for the novel. I can only assume that Fowles came up with both endings at roughly the same time, and each of them seemed as valid an ending as the other to him. Traditionally, it would have been up to him to chose one ending and make it final. However it seems he was not able, or did not want to chose just one of the endings to the novel. It would seem that Fowles is trying to be fair to all of the characters by including the various endings which satisfy all of them. Fowles comments that the job of a novelist is "to put two conflicting wants in the ring and describe the fight", which is essentially what he has done. However it is hard to decide for whom to fix the fight in favor of when one owns both fighters. Fowles also briefly mentions allowing "freedom of characters" in his writing. This concept is somewhat vague. To allow freedom of characters is to essentially allow the characters to do anything that the author thinks of. Why would a character ever not be able to do whatever the author thinks of ? There are no written rules that authors must conform to while writing a novel about how characters must behave, and that a character must stay in character. The identity of the character is constantly changing as the novel progresses, constantly being updated since the reader has only a brief glimpse into the life of a character in the novel. I think it would be quite rare for an author to not allow his characters freedom (unless of course he is living in a country under dictatorship or communism, but that doesn't count because the author doesn't have freedom either so why should his characters). "The chief argument of fight fixing is to show one's readers what one thinks of the world around one". The author must fix the fight in favor of one side to make the writing a novel, to create the story with one's views on the world implanted into it. Fowles however did not live in the world he is fixing the fight in and can only know about it from other readings or indirect information. Fowles describes a story that has supposedly taken place over a century ago, and shows several views of another world by giving the novel two separate endings. Through this Fowles shows two separate views , by giving us two separate endings, which essentially changes his entire outlook on the world from one ending to another. One is more optimistic than the other, so he gives us an optimistic look at the world as well as a pessimistic view of the world in which the novel unfolds. The bulk of Fowles comments on what a novelist should be are somewhat contradictory to what he has done with his novel. He has said that it is the job of the author to describe the conflict after having chosen the outcome. However, Fowles himself seems to play quite an active role in The French Lieutenant's Woman , often jumping in to give modern day references such as in the case of Mrs. Poultney and the Gestapo. I believe this kind of writing is very beneficial for the reader. If the author has enough information about an era to convincingly write about it, and make references to modern times, it seems to give the reader a better understanding of the novel and make them feel more involved. Although Fowles has said that his job is simply to describe the fight it is somewhat more interesting when he slips back into the 20th century. In the many places in the novel when Fowles jumps in to the novel to explain or further describe

The Art of Film Acting †Acting for the Camera (200 Level Course)

The Art of Film Acting – Acting for the Camera (200 Level Course) Free Online Research Papers The Art of Film Acting Acting for the Camera (200 Level Course) SUBTEXT Subtext is what you really are saying regardless of what your lines are saying. It is the true meaning underneath dialogue, and it is what you communicate when you talk to anyone in the film. Subtext is that unspoken communication by way of your emotions or feelings. Regardless of what your script lines are, subtext is what you really mean and what the audience is watching. Through the subtext, the audience discovers your relationship to the other actors, and only when you are relating to each other can there be useful subtext. You communicate subtext through your tone of voice, body language, looks and emotions. Subtext is an undercurrent that allows the audience to understand what is really going on between the actors. The FIVE ARTS OF FILM ACTING The five arts of film acting are the Art of Concentration, the Art of Not Knowing, the Art of Acceptance, the Art of Giving and Receiving and the Art of Relating. Jeremiah Comey –actor/director/tutor The Art of Concentration Focuses your attention, not on yourself but on the emotions of the other actor. Concentration is knowing where to place your attention. The Art of Not Knowing allows you the experience everything for the ‘first’ time. Not knowing keeps you alert and aware. The Art of Acceptance allows you to completely believe both the other actor and the imaginary circumstances without pretending. In the Art of Giving and Receiving you give your emotional experience to the other actor and are receptive through feedback. The art of giving and receiving stimulates genuine feelings. The Art of Relating is responding to an actor, object or situation verbally, nonverbally or physically. STUDYING ACTORS PERFORMANCE IN FILM Watch the Whole Film After watching the complete film, study the performances in selected scenes one at a time. The more times you look at a scene, the more you will see. Listen to the dialogue. If you have a copy of the screenplay script, read the scene. Study each performer separately. Determine the emotion each one is feeling. Does it Change? When? Be Specific. Are they listening? Are they practising the ‘Art of Knowing’? When? Does acceptance of the other character and circumstances colour the actor’s performance? Are both actors Giving Receiving? How? Are they physical with each other? Does giving and Receiving add to the relationship? Are they Relating? Now, with the sound turned off, view the selected scene. Notice what is really happening between the actors, not what the dialogue says is happening. View the selected scene again with the sound turned on. Research Papers on The Art of Film Acting - Acting for the Camera (200 Level Course)Where Wild and West MeetHonest Iagos Truth through DeceptionComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoRelationship between Media Coverage and Social andThree Concepts of PsychodynamicThe Spring and AutumnResearch Process Part OneMarketing of Lifeboy Soap A Unilever ProductEffects of Television Violence on ChildrenBionic Assembly System: A New Concept of Self

Post Award Phase Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Post Award Phase - Essay Example Secondly, the contractor has to evaluate the impact of such changes on the ongoing project. The evaluation will help in determining any negative impact of the change on the project. For instance, limited supply of sand may lengthen the construction period. After the evaluation, the contractor and the project manager shall document the change as either approved or disapproved. If the change is approved, its impact on the scope of the work should be documented on the purchase order change notice or on the contract amendment. However, disputes are likely to occur in the course of this change. Dispute resolution process should therefore be put in place. These include the identification of the problem, researching the facts, conducting evaluations and ensuring open communication between the two parties. These steps shall help resolve any dispute arising from the change. The resolution activities must also be documented for future